The Trucking Market in the Second Half of 2026: What Mid-Size Carriers Should Be Watching

Every major freight market research firm published an updated outlook in the past few weeks, and for the first time in over three years, they mostly agree with each other. ACT Research is calling 2026 a structural transition year. Ryder's mid-year update describes a transportation market entering the second half of 2026 that looks meaningfully different from where it started. RXO's Q2 data shows tender rejection rates at their highest levels since 2022. C.H. Robinson's own forecast, revised twice already this year, keeps moving in the same direction: tighter, faster than expected.

At the same time, a single Supreme Court decision handed down in May fundamentally changed how freight brokers will select carriers going forward, and almost nobody writing about the H2 2026 market outlook has connected that ruling to what it actually means for a mid-size carrier's freight opportunities.

This article covers both threads: the capacity and rate data every fleet director should understand heading into the second half of the year, and the legal development that is quietly about to change which carriers get chosen for broker-arranged freight.

‍

Capacity Is Exiting Faster Than Anyone Forecast at the Start of the Year

The consistent theme across every major freight market analysis published in the last month is that the tightening cycle everyone expected for 2026 arrived ahead of schedule and with more force than predicted.

ACT Research's most recent update describes the trucking industry entering the year in a stronger position than it held twelve months prior, driven by continued carrier exits, slower fleet expansion, and growing driver constraints that are limiting available capacity faster than a simple demand recovery would explain on its own. Their analysis is explicit that this is a different kind of recovery than prior cycles: rather than a demand surge pulling the market tight, 2026 is being shaped by structural tightening on the supply side that is restoring pricing discipline even with freight demand still uneven across sectors.

RXO's Q2 2026 truckload forecast confirms this pattern with a specific and striking data point. Spot rates moved above contract rates for the first time since 2022, and tender rejection rates reached their highest levels since that same year, meaning carriers now have more freight options and real pricing power for the first time in several years. Their analysis also flags something that most H2 outlook pieces miss entirely: accelerated carrier attrition combined with regulatory changes affecting the driver pool created a much more volatile shipper's market than typical seasonality alone would produce. RXO reported that CVSA International Roadcheck week in mid-May 2026 produced the highest week-over-week spot rate increase in four years, a magnitude well beyond what a normal seasonal enforcement event typically generates.

Ryder's own mid-2026 assessment describes the transportation market entering the second half of the year as looking different than it did at the start, with tender rejection rates at their highest levels since 2022 signaling that carriers now have real pricing leverage. Their forecast anticipates truckload capacity exits continuing through the remainder of the year, with spot rates likely to stay above contract rates in a growing number of lanes.

C.H. Robinson's forecast breaks the annual rate increase into two distinct halves, and the mechanics are worth understanding precisely because they explain why H2 specifically is the period where the tightening becomes visible in a carrier's actual rate confirmations. Their model attributes just under half of the year's projected two-percentage-point rate increase to the higher starting point carried over from January, while the remaining portion, just over one percentage point, is attributed directly to tightening capacity concentrated in the second half of the year. Long-haul dry van linehaul rates were expected to trough around $1.60 per mile in April or early May, meaning any carrier evaluating current rate offers against that spring floor should expect the trajectory from here to run upward rather than flat.

The Great American Insurance Group freight outlook, published in early June, frames the practical implication clearly: as 2026 progresses, capacity continues tightening as carriers leave the market, and while most analysts anticipate gradual rate increases rather than a sharp rebound, growth in shipment volumes is now expected to concentrate more heavily in the second half of the year than forecasters originally modeled.

For a mid-size carrier, this convergence of data points to one practical conclusion: contract rates negotiated during the softer conditions of late 2025 and early 2026 are increasingly out of step with where the market is heading, and carriers with contract commitments locked at those earlier levels are leaving money on the table in a market that is now paying more for the same capacity. How your customer mix between brokers and direct shippers affects your exposure becomes especially relevant in this specific window, since carriers with flexibility to capture rising spot rates are positioned very differently than those fully committed to contract volume priced months ago.

‍

The Supreme Court Just Changed Who Brokers Will Hire

On May 14, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9-0 decision in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC that eliminated one of the freight brokerage industry's most relied-upon legal defenses, and the ruling has direct, practical consequences for which carriers get selected for broker-arranged freight going forward.

The case arose from a 2017 Illinois highway accident in which a Caribe Transport driver struck a stopped vehicle, causing catastrophic injuries. The plaintiff sued C.H. Robinson, the freight broker that had arranged the shipment, arguing the broker negligently selected Caribe Transport despite the carrier's documented conditional safety rating and known deficiencies in driver qualifications, hours of service compliance, and vehicle maintenance. For years, brokers had successfully defended against this type of claim by arguing that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act, the federal law that preempts state regulation of trucking prices, routes, and services, shielded them from state tort liability entirely. Federal circuit courts had split on the question, with some allowing these claims to proceed and others dismissing them outright, which is what made Supreme Court review effectively inevitable.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for a unanimous court, held that a claim requiring a broker to exercise ordinary care in selecting a carrier falls within the FAAAA's safety exception, meaning it concerns motor vehicle safety and is not preempted by federal law. In plain terms, freight brokers can now be sued in state court when they select a carrier with a known poor safety record and that carrier causes an accident. Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence, joined by Justice Alito, added an important qualification: the ruling does not mean brokers face automatic or routine liability. Brokers who exercise reasonable care and document their carrier selection decisions remain well-positioned to defend against these claims. The standard going forward is ordinary care, the same standard that already governs most other business decisions, not strict liability for every accident involving a carrier they arranged freight for.

The practical consequence for the freight industry is already being discussed openly by insurance and legal advisors who work directly with brokers. Cottingham Butler's analysis of the ruling puts it directly: brokers operating under this new liability pressure will increasingly steer freight toward carriers they can defensibly select, meaning carriers with clean, well-documented safety records become measurably more valuable freight partners than they were before May 14, 2026. A broker facing potential state tort liability for a bad carrier selection has every incentive to pull FMCSA SAFER data before dispatching a load, review CSA BASIC scores as part of routine carrier vetting rather than an occasional check, and prioritize carriers whose safety documentation would hold up if a plaintiff's attorney examined the broker's selection process after an accident.

This is where the Montgomery decision intersects directly with a carrier's day-to-day competitiveness for broker freight. Why your CSA score and safety reputation are now a bigger asset than ever was already true before this ruling, since insurers price premiums based on exactly this data. What changes after Montgomery is that brokers now have their own independent, urgent legal reason to favor carriers with clean compliance records, which means a mid-size carrier's safety documentation is being evaluated by two separate financial gatekeepers, the insurance underwriter and the broker's own risk management process, at the same time and for related reasons.

For a mid-size fleet director, the practical response to Montgomery has three parts. First, treat FMCSA SAFER data and CSA BASIC scores as something to actively manage and monitor, not simply check occasionally, since brokers reviewing carrier selection more carefully post-Montgomery will be looking at exactly this information before dispatching freight. Second, if broker relationships have historically been transactional and rate-driven, expect brokers in the current environment to ask more detailed questions about safety programs, driver qualification files, and maintenance documentation than they did a year ago, and be prepared to answer those questions with actual documentation rather than assurances. Third, understand that this ruling, if anything, widens the gap between carriers with strong safety reputations and those without one, in a market where broker relationships already determine a meaningful share of freight access for carriers not yet running a fully developed direct shipper book.

The first wave of post-Montgomery negligent-hiring lawsuits is expected within weeks of the decision, according to industry legal analysis, meaning the practical effects on broker behavior are likely to intensify through the remainder of 2026 rather than settle immediately. Carriers who treat this as a passing legal development rather than an active shift in how they are being evaluated are likely to notice the effect only after losing freight to carriers who have already adjusted.

‍

Dedicated Transportation Is Gaining Ground, and Mid-Size Carriers Have an Opening

One trend that connects directly to both the capacity tightening data and the Montgomery decision is the growing shipper interest in dedicated transportation arrangements. Ryder's mid-2026 industry outlook identifies dedicated transportation as one of the strongest-performing segments of the transportation market through the remainder of the year, driven by shippers who are actively reassessing the tradeoffs between relying exclusively on the open spot and broker market versus securing long-term capacity through dedicated operations.

The logic behind this shift is straightforward given everything covered above. In a market where spot rates now sit above contract rates in a growing number of lanes, and where broker-arranged freight carries new liability considerations that make brokers more selective, shippers who need service reliability and capacity assurance are looking for carrier relationships that remove both the rate volatility and the carrier-selection risk from the equation entirely. Ryder's analysis notes that companies operating private fleets are facing their own mounting challenges around driver recruitment, equipment costs, insurance expenses, and compliance requirements, which is pushing many of them toward dedicated transportation models that provide the operational benefits of a private fleet without the full burden of running one internally.

For a mid-size carrier with 20 to 50 trucks, this represents a genuine opportunity that requires deliberate positioning rather than passive waiting. A carrier that can present a documented safety program, consistent service history, and the operational capacity to commit to dedicated lane volume is exactly the kind of partner shippers are actively seeking in the current environment, and is exactly the kind of carrier that survives Montgomery-era broker scrutiny without friction because the relationship structure bypasses the broker liability question entirely. How your customer mix between brokers and direct shippers affects your exposure becomes a more urgent strategic question in this specific window than it has been in prior years, because the shippers evaluating dedicated arrangements right now are doing so because current market conditions are pushing them to, not because of a long-term strategic plan they have been executing for years. Carriers who can present themselves credibly in that conversation in the second half of 2026 are competing for relationships that may not be as available once the market conditions driving this shift settle into a new equilibrium.

‍

Equipment Markets Are Responding to Freight Conditions, Unevenly

ACT Research's data shows equipment markets improving through 2026, though not uniformly across segments. Class 8 demand has strengthened meaningfully as fleets respond to better freight conditions, replacement needs that had been deferred during the prior downturn, and the approaching regulatory changes tied to the 2027 EPA NOx emissions rule. Medium-duty markets remain comparatively softer, tied more closely to housing and small-business activity than to the truckload freight cycle. Trailer demand is stabilizing gradually alongside the broader freight market recovery.

This equipment market data connects directly to the acquisition timing question discussed in how tariffs are reshaping which freight lanes matter most right now, where the 2027 NOx rule's price step-up on new equipment was already a factor pushing fleets toward pre-buy strategies for 2026-model trucks. The ACT data confirms that this dynamic is now showing up as measurable Class 8 order strength, meaning fleets that have been considering the pre-buy window should recognize that build slot availability is likely tightening as more carriers act on the same signal simultaneously.

‍

LTL Freight Is Absorbing Spillover From the Truckload Squeeze

A dynamic that is easy to overlook if a fleet operates exclusively in truckload is the crossover effect happening in the less-than-truckload market. C.H. Robinson's 2026 trends analysis notes that since one of the largest and lowest-cost LTL carriers exited the market in 2023, not all of that lost capacity returned to the industry. Soft market conditions through 2024 and 2025 made this manageable for most shippers, but as truckload capacity tightens and rates rise through 2026, that dynamic is reversing: smaller shipments that had been consolidated or moved via truckload during the soft market are being pushed back into the LTL system, and LTL carriers are reporting mid-single-digit rate increases in response, broadly consistent with the roughly 5 percent long-run average growth in LTL pricing over the past three decades.

PLS Logistics' mid-2026 analysis of how the year has actually unfolded compared to forecasts made in December 2025 confirms that the directional predictions, rates rising, truckload tightening spilling into LTL, carriers exercising pricing discipline, held up well, but the speed of the transition and the way these pressures compounded together was underestimated across the industry. Their assessment for the remainder of the year is direct: the window to act before second-half demand growth further tightens the market is narrowing, and shippers and carriers who move early on securing contract rates and deepening carrier relationships are better positioned than those who wait.

For a mid-size truckload carrier, this LTL dynamic matters less directly but confirms the same underlying signal from a different angle: capacity across the entire ground freight system is tightening faster and more broadly than forecasters expected six months ago, which strengthens the case for carriers to act on rate negotiations and capacity commitments now rather than waiting for confirmation that feels safer but arrives later in a tightening market.

‍

What This Means for a Mid-Size Carrier's Second Half of 2026

Pulling the threads above together into practical direction, four actions stand out as the ones worth acting on in the coming months rather than deferring.

Reassess contract rates against the current spot environment rather than assuming existing agreements reflect market reality. With multiple sources confirming spot rates have moved above contract rates in a meaningful number of lanes for the first time since 2022, a carrier holding contract commitments priced during the softer conditions of late 2025 is very likely underpriced relative to what the same freight would command today. Your fleet's cost per mile baseline for evaluating new rates is the essential reference point for determining whether current contract rates still clear your actual cost floor with adequate margin, or whether renegotiation conversations are overdue.

Treat CSA score management and safety documentation as an active, ongoing priority rather than a background compliance task, given both the insurance pricing implications that were already true and the new broker liability dynamic that Montgomery introduced. A carrier with a demonstrably strong, well-documented safety program is now more valuable to brokers specifically because of the legal exposure question, not only because of the operational quality it represents.

Evaluate whether the current market conditions create an opening to pursue dedicated transportation or deeper direct shipper relationships, particularly if your fleet has spare capacity or is positioned in a corridor where shippers are actively rethinking their broker dependency. The shippers exploring this shift right now are doing so because current conditions are pushing them to reconsider, which creates a window that may not remain as open once the market stabilizes into whatever equilibrium follows this tightening cycle.

Confirm your equipment acquisition timeline against both the 2027 NOx rule cost step-up and the Class 8 order strength data showing other fleets are already acting on the same pre-buy logic. Build slot availability is a function of how many other carriers reach the same conclusion at the same time, and that competition is intensifying as the data becomes more widely understood across the industry.

For mid-size carriers evaluating what operational and financial infrastructure supports acting on these priorities effectively, fleet services and support for mid-size carriers is the place to start that conversation.

‍

Sources

1. ACT Research. 2026 Trucking Industry Forecast and Market Outlook. actresearch.net

2. Ryder System, Inc. 2026 Trucking Industry Trends and Outlook. June 2026. ryder.com

3. RXO. Q2 2026 Truckload Market Forecast: Rate and Capacity Trends. May 2026. rxo.com

4. C.H. Robinson. North America Truckload Freight Market Update. January 2026. chrobinson.com

5. C.H. Robinson. Key Truckload and LTL Trends for 2026. December 2025. chrobinson.com

6. Great American Insurance Group. Freight Market Outlook: Trucking. June 2026. greatamericaninsurancegroup.com

7. PLS Logistics. LTL Freight in 2026: Trends, Rates, and Market Outlook. plslogistics.com

8. Anderson Trucking Service. Freight Market Forecast: Are Shipping Costs on the Rise in 2026? April 2026. atsinc.com

9. Supreme Court of the United States. Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, No. 24-1238. Decided May 14, 2026. supremecourt.gov

10. SCOTUSblog. Court Rules Freight Brokers Can Face Negligent Hiring Suits Under State Law. May 2026. scotusblog.com

11. FreightWaves. The Supreme Court Just Told Every Freight Broker That They Can Be Sued. May 2026. freightwaves.com

12. Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani. Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC: A Turning Point in Freight Broker Liability. June 2026. grsm.com

13. Cottingham Butler. The Supreme Court's Montgomery Decision: What Brokers, Carriers, and Shippers Should Know. May 2026. cottinghambutler.com

14. M3 Insurance. Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II: Where Freight Broker Programs Are Exposed. June 2026. m3ins.com

15. Millennials Trucking. What the Freight Recession Taught Fleet Owners About Cost Structure. millennialstrucking.com

16. Millennials Trucking. Freight Broker vs. Direct Shipper: What the Right Customer Mix Looks Like for a Mid-Size Carrier. millennialstrucking.com

17. Millennials Trucking. How Tariffs Are Reshaping U.S. Freight Lanes in 2026. millennialstrucking.com‍
18. Millennials Trucking. Fleet Trucking Insurance: Why Mid-Size Carriers Overpay and What to Do About It. millennialstrucking.com

‍